Order by improvement #1274
Merged
Order by improvement #1274
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rsill-neo4j
reviewed
May 15, 2025
|
|
||
| `ORDER BY` specifies how the output of a clause should be sorted. | ||
| It be used as a sub-clause following `RETURN` or `WITH`. | ||
| `ORDER BY` is a subclause which specifies the order in which the output of a xref:clauses/return.adoc[`RETURN`] or xref:clauses/with.adoc[`WITH`] clause. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| `ORDER BY` is a subclause which specifies the order in which the output of a xref:clauses/return.adoc[`RETURN`] or xref:clauses/with.adoc[`WITH`] clause. | |
| `ORDER BY` is a subclause which specifies the order of the output of a xref:clauses/return.adoc[`RETURN`] or xref:clauses/with.adoc[`WITH`] clause. |
| If it is an aggregating or `DISTINCT` projection, only the variables available in the projection are available. | ||
| If the projection does not alter the output cardinality (which aggregation and `DISTINCT` do), variables available from before the projecting clause are also available. | ||
| When the projection clause shadows already existing variables, only the new variables are available. | ||
| The variables available to `ORDER BY` depends on whether or not the preceding `RETURN` or `WITH` clause performs an aggregation to combine results or uses `DISTINCT` to remove duplicates. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| The variables available to `ORDER BY` depends on whether or not the preceding `RETURN` or `WITH` clause performs an aggregation to combine results or uses `DISTINCT` to remove duplicates. | |
| The variables available to `ORDER BY` depend on whether or not the preceding `RETURN` or `WITH` clause performs an aggregation to combine results or uses `DISTINCT` to remove duplicates. |
hvub
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
rsill-neo4j
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
JPryce-Aklundh
commented
May 21, 2025
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
JPryce-Aklundh
added
cherry-pick-this-to-5.x
JPryce-Aklundh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
JPryce-Aklundh
added a commit
to JPryce-Aklundh/docs-cypher
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
JPryce-Aklundh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.