Skip to content

Conversation

@gem-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

I wasn't sure how much to add for this feature, it is good to be mentioned, but as we have no central place for dynamic labels and types it makes it tricky to find good places to add it

@gem-neo4j gem-neo4j force-pushed the dev_add_dynamic_label_expressions branch from 2eb812c to 568655e Compare July 9, 2025 11:04
Copy link
Contributor

@hvub hvub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a baseline I think that is perfectly fine.

General oberservation:

  • Predicates for not link label expression, nor have dedicates entry for the label expression predicate.
  • There is link to label expression on the main expression page.

That is improvable, but certainly outside of this PR.

If there is the idea to give more love the dynamic label expression documentation, then such refinements can be part of that.

Copy link
Contributor

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added suggestions for tags + include for the duplicated section

@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Jul 24, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j merged commit 1ccfc70 into neo4j:dev Jul 31, 2025
5 checks passed
rsill-neo4j added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants