Name Repeat operator without Trail/Walk parameter #1343
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
All the description of the operator should be applicable independent of the traversal path mode. In EXPLAIN outputs, the parameter will be included, though.
rsill-neo4j
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2025
Contributor
rsill-neo4j
left a comment
rsill-neo4j
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to which version(s) does this apply?
Contributor
Author
|
I would argue it should have been like this since the repeat operator was introduced. But it becomes most relevant from Cypher version 25, when we have |
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
rsill-neo4j
added
the
cherry-picked
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All the description of the operator should be applicable independent of the traversal path mode. In EXPLAIN outputs, the parameter will be included, though.
I have left the description in the additions document, as this is how it was introduced. Maybe we should rename it there as well.