Skip to content

Conversation

@jackwaudby
Copy link
Contributor

@jackwaudby jackwaudby commented Sep 26, 2024

Minor improvements to the status check page, mainly aligning the formatting closer to the other monitoring pages:

  • Using tables for the arguments and return values
  • Change title to 'Monitor replication status'
  • Add an example of sample output

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Sep 27, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jackwaudby jackwaudby merged commit 9f6313a into neo4j:dev Sep 27, 2024
8 checks passed
NataliaIvakina pushed a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-operations that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Minor improvements to the status check page, mainly aligning the
formatting closer to the other monitoring pages:
- Using tables for the arguments and return values 
- Change title to 'Monitor replication status'
- Add an example of sample output
NataliaIvakina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Minor improvements to the status check page, mainly aligning the
formatting closer to the other monitoring pages:
- Using tables for the arguments and return values 
- Change title to 'Monitor replication status'
- Add an example of sample output

Co-authored-by: Jack Waudby <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants