Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion modules/ROOT/pages/monitoring/logging.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ Included when xref:configuration/configuration-settings.adoc#config_db.logs.quer
| Connection details.

| database
| The database name on which the query is run.
| The database name on which the query is run. This field will be `<none>` if it is not possible to parse and route the query to the correct database.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| The database name on which the query is run. This field will be `<none>` if it is not possible to parse and route the query to the correct database.
| The database name on which the query is run. This field will be `<none>` if it is impossible to parse and route the query to the correct database.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another editorial suggestion - "route the query to a database" instead of "route a query to the correct database" - I would argue that there might be other reasons a query might not be routed to the user's definition of "correct"!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@LinneaAndersson LinneaAndersson Nov 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For some reason it felt wrong to say impossibe (don't ask me why 😄). Would it be okay with the change I made to:

"This field will be <none> if the query cannot be parsed and routed to a database."


| executingUser
| The name of the user executing the query.
Expand Down