Skip to content

Conversation

@Hunterness
Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness commented May 7, 2024

Notifications introduced in https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/25227 (merged, but behind feature flag). Feature flag removed in https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/26923.

[cols="<1s,<4"]
|===
|Code
m|Neo.ClientNotification.Security.AuthProviderNotDefined
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This notification was covered by CIP-145.

[cols="<1s,<4"]
|===
|Code
m|Neo.ClientNotification.Security.ExternalAuthNotEnabled
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This notification was an error in CIP-145 but was decided to be just a warning during implementation (to not lock out current external only users from being able to switch by first adding the new external only users to system before disabling their ways to log in)

@renetapopova renetapopova self-requested a review May 9, 2024 09:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor editorial suggestions. Otherwise, it looks good from my side.

@Hunterness Hunterness force-pushed the dev-linked-users-notifications branch from 52242a7 to 2d5382c Compare June 12, 2024 07:07
@Hunterness
Copy link
Contributor Author

@renetapopova The PR introducing these notifications has been merged. However the feature is still behind a feature flag and not fully done, should we merge this already now or should it wait for the feature to be GA?

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

renetapopova commented Jun 12, 2024

Are these notifications visible to the user?

@Hunterness
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hunterness commented Jun 12, 2024

Are these notifications visible to the user?

If you turn on the feature flag (an internal setting) and try out the linked users feature and trigger them, yes. If you don't turn on the feature flag then no.

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Are these notifications visible to the user?

If you turn on the feature flag (an internal setting) and try out the linked users feature and trigger them, yes. If you don't turn on the feature flag then no.

We don't surface internal settings, so I guess we don't need to merge it for now.

@renetapopova renetapopova removed the 5.21 label Jun 13, 2024
@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina self-assigned this Jun 13, 2024
@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Related to neo4j/docs-operations#1745

@Hunterness Hunterness added 5.24 and removed 5.25 labels Aug 29, 2024
@Hunterness
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated version tag to match the related docs PR

@Hunterness Hunterness force-pushed the dev-linked-users-notifications branch from 599e7d7 to e842ee7 Compare September 9, 2024 15:11
@renetapopova renetapopova force-pushed the dev-linked-users-notifications branch from e842ee7 to d4181a6 Compare September 17, 2024 14:48
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Sep 17, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit e958617 into neo4j:dev Sep 17, 2024
5 checks passed
NataliaIvakina pushed a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-status-codes that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Notifications introduced in
neo-technology/neo4j#25227 (merged, but behind
feature flag). Feature flag removed in
neo-technology/neo4j#26923.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants