Skip to content

Conversation

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found four smaller differences compared with the codebase on this one

@Lojjs Lojjs self-assigned this Oct 23, 2024
@renetapopova renetapopova requested a review from Lojjs October 24, 2024 14:19
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now, thanks

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Oct 25, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR includes documentation updates
View the updated docs at https://neo4j-docs-status-codes-198.surge.sh

Updated pages:

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit d65d442 into neo4j:gqlstatus-errors Oct 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@renetapopova renetapopova deleted the gql-51 branch October 25, 2024 08:59
renetapopova added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants