Skip to content

Conversation

@NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we must have messed up the spreadsheet somehow for these ones, because it is actually only 22000, 22003 and 22N88 of them which are used.

@Lojjs Lojjs self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think we must have messed up the spreadsheet somehow for these ones, because it is actually only 22000, 22003 and 22N88 of them which are used.

Ok, then I'll remove them from the PR and comment on the spreadsheet.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Oct 30, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing, looks good now

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina merged commit 6e706d8 into neo4j:gqlstatus-errors Oct 30, 2024
5 checks passed
@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina deleted the standard-defined-codes branch October 30, 2024 13:19
renetapopova pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants