- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 35
Document errors implemented in 5.26 #213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two comments, rest looks good.
| === 42NA6 | ||
|  | ||
| Status description:: info: invalid alias target. Aliases are not allowed to target composite databases. | ||
|  | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one is totally different between the codebase and the spreadsheet, not even about the same topic 😅 Do you know when it was changed and can verify which is correct @anderson4j and @WilcoNeo ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did not change this code as far a I can see.
To me it looks like this one is more correct than what is currently in the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes looking as the usage, it looks like the codebase is wrong and docs and spreadsheet is correct. I will make a card to update the codebase
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <[email protected]>
| Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can merge now, thanks
No description provided.