Skip to content

Conversation

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova commented Dec 27, 2024

Need to include also the codes from https://github.com/neo4j/docs-status-codes/pull/249/files

@Lojjs Lojjs self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work with this massive PR! Most of my comments are small (like copy-paste errors and such), the two bigger ones we can discuss in an upcoming sync

@Lojjs Lojjs mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
@renetapopova renetapopova force-pushed the dev-split-codes branch 2 times, most recently from 88489e0 to 2664896 Compare January 28, 2025 10:57
@renetapopova renetapopova requested a review from Lojjs February 3, 2025 17:06
@Lojjs Lojjs removed the 2025.01 label Feb 4, 2025
@renetapopova renetapopova requested review from Lojjs and removed request for ggowrimani February 4, 2025 15:59
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was not very clear, meant like this

@renetapopova renetapopova requested a review from Lojjs February 4, 2025 16:14
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Feb 4, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👏 All good now!

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit b26018c into neo4j:dev Feb 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@renetapopova renetapopova deleted the dev-split-codes branch February 4, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants