Skip to content

Conversation

@Lojjs
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs commented Feb 10, 2025

@Lojjs Lojjs added dev The default branch. gqlstatus-errors labels Feb 10, 2025
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Feb 10, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @Lojjs

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

For which version is this one, 2025.02?

@Lojjs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lojjs commented Feb 10, 2025

For which version is this one, 2025.02?

Yes probably. It might be that we decide to backport the product PR to 5.26 as well. But let me add a 2025.02 label for now

@Lojjs Lojjs added the 2025.02 label Feb 10, 2025
@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

For which version is this one, 2025.02?

Yes probably. It might be that we decide to backport the product PR to 5.26 as well. But let me add a 2025.02 label for now

Then, we can merge it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit 3b7bf56 into neo4j:dev Feb 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@Lojjs Lojjs mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2025
renetapopova pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Me and @alexfoxgill decided to backport this change to 5.26 as well

cherry-picks #261
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants