Skip to content

Conversation

@Hunterness
Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness commented Jun 5, 2025

Updated in https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/31435 (merged the day after cutoff for 2025.06)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the main PR didn't make the 2025.06 cutoff

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both look good. Could you also add an example scenario and example?

@Hunterness Hunterness requested a review from renetapopova July 8, 2025 15:13
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thank you!

@renetapopova renetapopova force-pushed the dev-index-code-updates branch from 7d015c4 to c76606f Compare July 9, 2025 09:29
@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Jul 9, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit fdb9faf into neo4j:dev Jul 9, 2025
4 checks passed
NataliaIvakina pushed a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-status-codes that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
…to the corresponding constraint errors (neo4j#338)

Updated in neo-technology/neo4j#31435 (merged
the day after cutoff for 2025.06)

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants