Skip to content

Conversation

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

renetapopova and others added 30 commits February 5, 2025 17:47
Instead of PR neo4j#253

---------

Co-authored-by: Louise Söderström <[email protected]>
This error's link
(https://neo4j.com/docs/status-codes/current/errors/gql-errors/#_42n26)
is not working because it's not listed in the content-nav file due to a
typo.
I hope I did this right - here is the accompanying implementation
neo-technology/neo4j#29934
…22N06, 42N08, 51N12, 51N27 (neo4j#282)

Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
New error used for parsing the vector value constructor function

---------

Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <[email protected]>
…orted.dbms.shutdown example to features deprecated without a replacement (neo4j#286)

Replaces neo4j#269
As this change will not be visible to the user when they get the error,
I opted for not including it in changelog/mark as changed in 2025.04.
Let me know if you think otherwise.

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
Causing broken link.
It's also being addressed in the main branch using this PR
neo4j#293, so no need to
cherry-pick it.
Codes needed to cover errors left over in deperected constructors.
[Monorepo PR](neo-technology/neo4j#30680).

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
Introduced in neo-technology/neo4j#30884

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
renetapopova and others added 18 commits May 9, 2025 09:06
Add docs for new cluster codes

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
These have been deprecated for over a year.
Corresponding Neo4j PR:
neo-technology/neo4j#31193

I tried to follow the same pattern as for 22NB9, but I did not know if
it made sense to write out the status description in the example, given
that it does not have any parameters.

Also note, that while the Neo4j PR will be included in 2025.06, the
vector feature is still under a feature flag so I am not entirely sure
about the version for this docs PR
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
This came out of a discussion here
neo-technology/neo4j#31828 (comment)

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lidia Zuin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JoelBergstrand <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hannes Voigt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nick Giles <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ConorNeo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Balazs Lendvai <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Satia Herfert <[email protected]>
Added a new error: neo-technology/neo4j#31206

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
The errors have already been merged. The deprecations come from
neo-technology/neo4j#31541

---------

Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <[email protected]>
@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Jul 2, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit 4b18139 into neo4j:main Jul 2, 2025
4 checks passed
@renetapopova renetapopova deleted the main-2025.06 branch July 2, 2025 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.