Add errors for unsupported combinations with path modes #399
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR includes documentation updates New pages: Updated pages: |
arnefischereit
added
the
team-cypher-planner
renetapopova
requested changes
Oct 28, 2025
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
| = 42I39 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| = 42I39 | |
| :page-role: new-2025.11 | |
| = 42I39 |
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
| = 42N60 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| = 42N60 | |
| :page-role: new-2025.11 | |
| = 42N60 |
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
| = 42N61 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| = 42N61 | |
| :page-role: new-2025.11 | |
| = 42N61 |
|
|
||
| == Status description | ||
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - invalid use of shortest path function. Mixing the `{ <<fun>> }` function with path selectors or explicit match modes is not allowed. | ||
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - invalid use of shortest path function. Mixing the `{ <<fun>> }` function with path selectors, explicit match modes or explicit path modes is not allowed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - invalid use of shortest path function. Mixing the `{ <<fun>> }` function with path selectors, explicit match modes or explicit path modes is not allowed. | |
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - invalid use of shortest path function. Mixing the `{ <<fun>> }` function with path selectors, explicit match modes, or explicit path modes is not allowed. |
| = 42N60 | ||
|
|
||
| == Status description | ||
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - unsupported combination of match mode and path mode. REPEATABLE ELEMENTS with `{ <<pathMode>> }` path mode is not supported. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is REPEATABLE ELEMENTS capitalized?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we also add an explanation/ example scenario for each of the errors? See 22N71, 22N69, 22NAB, 42I64, and many more for inspiration.
| = 42N61 | ||
|
|
||
| == Status description | ||
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - unsupported mixing of different path modes. Mixing `{ <<pathModeList>> }` in the same graph pattern is not supported. Split the pattern into separate MATCH clauses instead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - unsupported mixing of different path modes. Mixing `{ <<pathModeList>> }` in the same graph pattern is not supported. Split the pattern into separate MATCH clauses instead. | |
| error: syntax error or access rule violation - unsupported mixing of different path modes. Mixing `{ <<pathModeList>> }` in the same graph pattern is not supported. Split the pattern into separate `MATCH` clauses instead. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New error codes (and one message update) for path mode semantic checking