Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade vitest from 1.6.1 to 3.0.4 #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade vitest from 1.6.1 to 3.0.4 #63

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@nerdy-tech-com-gitub
Copy link
Owner

@nerdy-tech-com-gitub nerdy-tech-com-gitub commented Feb 18, 2025 •
edited by sourcery-ai bot
Loading

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 1.6.1 to 3.0.4.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.

⚠️ Warning: This PR contains major version upgrade(s), and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 46 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released a month ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
medium severity Missing Origin Validation in WebSockets
SNYK-JS-VITEST-8688130		 322 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: vitest

@snyk-bot
feat: upgrade vitest from 1.6.1 to 3.0.4
c9e68ea 
Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 1.6.1 to 3.0.4.

See this package in npm:
vitest

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/nerds-github/project/ef708957-d107-4807-bb9b-ffb67ea15337?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request upgrades the vitest dependency from version 1.6.0 to 3.0.4. This update includes bug fixes, new features, and breaking changes as outlined in the release notes. Reviewers should pay close attention to the potential breaking changes and ensure compatibility with the existing codebase.

Updated class diagram for Vitest API

classDiagram
    class Vitest {
        +version: string
        +config: VitestConfig
        +start()
        +close()
        +onTestsRerun(callback: Function)
        +reporter: Reporter
    }
    class VitestConfig {
        +provide: Record<string, any>
        +globalSetup: string[]
        +resolveSnapshotPath(filepath: string, config: VitestConfig): string
    }
    class Reporter {
        +onInit(ctx: VitestContext): void
        +onFinished(ctx: VitestContext): void
    }
    class VitestContext {
        +project: Project
    }
    class Project {
        +name: string
    }

    note for Vitest "Exposes versions from vitest/node entry point and statically on Vitest"
    note for VitestConfig "Test context can inject values from the config's provide"
    note for VitestConfig "Provides config to resolveSnapshotPath"
    note for Reporter "Introduce the new reporter API"
    note for VitestContext "Add resolved project names to the reporter API"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgrade the vitest dependency from version 1.6.0 to 3.0.4.
  • Updated the vitest version in package.json.
 dashboard/package.json
Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

sourcery-ai[bot]
sourcery-ai bot reviewed Feb 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai[bot] sourcery-ai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@nerdy-tech-com-gitub @snyk-bot