Add Extreme Networks 5320-48P-8XE-FabricEngine device type

[0lini]

This PR adds the Extreme Networks Switch 5320-48P-8XE with the Fabric Engine OS. I modeled SFP-Ports as module bays aswell, please tell me if this is an issue.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new device type definition for the Extreme Networks 5320-48P-8XE switch running Fabric Engine OS. This is a variant of the existing 5320-48P-8XE device type that accounts for the specific port behavior and interface naming conventions when running Fabric Engine instead of Switch Engine. The device is a 1U 48-port PoE+ switch with 8 additional 10GbE SFP+ uplink ports.

Key changes:

• New device type file for Fabric Engine OS variant with different port configuration
• Uses 1/X interface naming pattern instead of simple X pattern used in Switch Engine variant
• Implements module bays for SFP+ ports (49-56) instead of interfaces, with some ports marked as blocked in Fabric Engine

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[danner26]

Hello, thank you for contributing. Please resolve all failed test cases before marking this PR as ready to review. Thank you

[0lini]

Hello, thank you for contributing. Please resolve all failed test cases before marking this PR as ready to review. Thank you

Everything seems to be ready now. I would love some feedback on the SFP module stuff. Should the SFP module bays be called "SFP 1", "SFP 2", and so on?

[aaronaxvig]

I think it would be useful to have SFP+ in the module bay name. SFP+ 1, SFP+ 2, etc. At least until there is some provision for documenting module types (vague ModuleTypeProfile capabilities notwithstanding...).

[aaronaxvig]

You could duplicate the images with the FabricEngine name as well. Then some theoretical importing tool would grab them.