Update module github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 to v2.23.4

[red-hat-konflux]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2	require	patch	v2.23.0 -> v2.23.4

---

Release Notes

onsi/ginkgo (github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2)

v2.23.4

Compare Source

2.23.4

Prior to this release Ginkgo would compute the incorrect number of available CPUs when running with -p in a linux container. Thanks to @​emirot for the fix!

Features

• Add automaxprocs for using CPUQuota [2b9c428]

Fixes

• clarify gotchas about -vet flag [1f59d07]

Maintenance

• bump dependencies [2d134d5]

v2.23.3

Compare Source

2.23.3

Fixes

• allow - as a standalone argument [cfcc1a5]
• Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Chdir() and GinkoTBWrapper.Context() [feaf292]
• ignore exit code for symbol test on linux [88e2282]

v2.23.2

Compare Source

2.23.2

🎉🎉🎉

At long last, some long-standing performance gaps between ginkgo and go test have been resolved!

Ginkgo operates by running go test -c to generate test binaries, and then running those binaries. It turns out that the compilation step of go test -c is slower than go test's compilation step because go test strips out debug symbols (ldflags=-w) whereas go test -c does not.

Ginkgo now passes the appropriate ldflags to go test -c when running specs to strip out symbols. This is only done when it is safe to do so and symbols are preferred when profiling is enabled and when ginkgo build is called explicitly.

This, coupled, with the instructions for disabling XProtect on MacOS yields a much better performance experience with Ginkgo.

v2.23.1

Compare Source

2.23.1

🚨 For users on MacOS 🚨

A long-standing Ginkgo performance issue on MacOS seems to be due to mac's antimalware XProtect. You can follow the instructions here to disable it in your terminal. Doing so sped up Ginkgo's own test suite from 1m8s to 47s.

Fixes

Ginkgo's CLI is now a bit clearer if you pass flags in incorrectly:

• make it clearer that you need to pass a filename to the various profile flags, not an absolute directory [a0e52ff]
• emit an error and exit if the ginkgo invocation includes flags after positional arguments [b799d8d]

This might cause existing CI builds to fail. If so then it's likely that your CI build was misconfigured and should be corrected. Open an issue if you need help.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 5am on sunday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

This PR has been generated by MintMaker (powered by Renovate Bot).

[red-hat-konflux]

ℹ Artifact update notice

File name: go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

• 3 additional dependencies were updated

Details:

Package	Change
github.com/onsi/gomega	v1.36.2 -> v1.36.3
github.com/google/pprof	v0.0.0-20250317173921-a4b03ec1a45e -> v0.0.0-20250403155104-27863c87afa6
golang.org/x/sys	v0.31.0 -> v0.32.0

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign msherif1234 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

Hi @red-hat-konflux[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a netobserv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.30%. Comparing base (2f92f14) to head (687a301).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #267   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   22.30%   22.30%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1417     1417           
=======================================
  Hits          316      316           
  Misses       1084     1084           
  Partials       17       17           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	22.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.