Skip to content

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Oct 14, 2025

(wip status = pretty much done, except for handshake version (see code comment), maybe needs an experimental feature gate; correctness to be verified, as I'm getting less TLS flows than expected - am I missing something?)

use tls.VersionName

(wip status = pretty much done, except for handshake version (see code
comment), maybe needs an experimental feature gate; correctness to be
verified, as I'm getting less TLS flows than expected - am I missing
something?)

use tls.VersionName
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign oliviercazade for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

} else if (((u8 *)start_payload)[0] == 0x14 || ((u8 *)start_payload)[0] == 0x15 ||
((u8 *)start_payload)[0] == 0x17) {
pkt->ssl_version =
((u16)(((u8 *)start_payload)[1])) << 8 | (u16)(((u8 *)start_payload)[2]);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(need to check endianness for that)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant