Skip to content

Conversation

ralphbean
Copy link

For https://issues.redhat.com/browse/KONFLUX-6210, clair needs access to a name and cpe label that it can use to look up the image in VEX statements.

See also release-engineering/rhtap-ec-policy#149

Signed-off-by: Ralph Bean [email protected]
Assisted-by: Gemini

…vability-console-plugin-zstream

For https://issues.redhat.com/browse/KONFLUX-6210, clair needs access to a name and cpe label that it can use to look up the image in VEX statements.

See also release-engineering/rhtap-ec-policy#149

Signed-off-by: Ralph Bean <[email protected]>
Assisted-by: Gemini
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jpinsonneau for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Hi @ralphbean. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a netobserv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.20%. Comparing base (06d6d06) to head (6024587).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-1.9    #1053   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        55.20%   55.20%           
============================================
  Files              199      199           
  Lines            10627    10627           
  Branches          1232     1232           
============================================
  Hits              5867     5867           
  Misses            4392     4392           
  Partials           368      368           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 57.91% <ø> (ø)
unittests 49.24% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Oct 1, 2025

@ralphbean this one seems wrong, can you please check/update your script?

@jotak jotak closed this Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants