-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
NETOBSERV-1965: Add UDNs merger logic to merge udns accross nodes for the same flow #698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
a643b6c
to
340a156
Compare
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=be118dc make set-plugin-image |
340a156
to
1e6673b
Compare
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=791df49 make set-plugin-image |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good, thanks @msherif1234
669efe4
to
db98fba
Compare
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=6dcb777 make set-plugin-image |
db98fba
to
afc8a2d
Compare
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=d926aab make set-plugin-image |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=471fe5d make set-plugin-image |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good 👌
@jotak should we proceed with Udns?: string[];
?
What's the plan for the topology ?
@jpinsonneau this PR netobserv/network-observability-operator#1050 is removing UDN
field
/test plugin-cypress |
/hold |
@msherif1234 I'm testing this PR with this additional change: in ids.ts, function export const get7Tuple = (r: Record): string => {
return `${r.fields.SrcAddr}:${r.fields.SrcPort || 'x'}:${r.fields.SrcK8S_NetworkName || 'x'}→${r.fields.DstAddr}:${r.fields.DstPort || 'x'}:${r.fields.DstK8S_NetworkName || 'x'}@${r.fields.Proto}`;
}; Do you want me to push on your branch? |
/unhold |
@msherif1234: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1965 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM !
Just need make fmt
👼
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=d42fe47 make set-plugin-image |
@msherif1234: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jotak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Description
need to merge UDNs across nodes for the same flow like we do today for interfaces and directions
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.