Skip to content

Conversation

@jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Jan 14, 2026

Also avoid configuring xlat in flp when unused

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labeled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 18.75000% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.62%. Comparing base (7ce34d4) to head (b91e032).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/controller/flp/flp_pipeline_builder.go 18.75% 12 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.55%   73.62%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines        9841     9846       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         7239     7249      +10     
- Misses       2161     2162       +1     
+ Partials      441      435       -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.62% <18.75%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
api/flowcollector/v1beta2/flowcollector_types.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/controller/flp/flp_pipeline_builder.go 73.08% <18.75%> (-2.58%) ⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Avoid configuring xlat in flp when unused
@jotak jotak changed the title (trivial) Avoid configuring xlat in flp when unused NETOBSERV-2553: Allow overriding ipfix enterpriseid Jan 15, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2026

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2553 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labeled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2026

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2553 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Also avoid configuring xlat in flp when unused

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labeled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jotak jotak added the needs-review Tells that the PR needs a review label Jan 15, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jan 15, 2026
@jotak jotak added ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. and removed needs-review Tells that the PR needs a review labels Jan 15, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

New images:

  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:fc65612
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-sha-fc65612
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-sha-fc65612

They will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build:

# Direct deployment, from operator repo
IMAGE=quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:fc65612 make deploy

# Or using operator-sdk
operator-sdk run bundle quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-sha-fc65612

Or as a Catalog Source:

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: netobserv-dev
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-sha-fc65612
  displayName: NetObserv development catalog
  publisher: Me
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 1m

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from jpinsonneau. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jan 16, 2026
@jotak jotak added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Jan 16, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

New images:

  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:1fe1756
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-sha-1fe1756
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-sha-1fe1756

They will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build:

# Direct deployment, from operator repo
IMAGE=quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:1fe1756 make deploy

# Or using operator-sdk
operator-sdk run bundle quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-sha-1fe1756

Or as a Catalog Source:

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: netobserv-dev
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-sha-1fe1756
  displayName: NetObserv development catalog
  publisher: Me
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 1m

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants