Skip to content

Conversation

@jimklimov
Copy link
Member

PR comments were too noisy (lots of emails), and a way was found to at least somehow use GH Checks (tied to a commit so regardless of PR context).

Also fixes some docs and comments.

… that POWERDOWNFLAG can happen on both NUT servers and pure client machines

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…on to change the action/check entry itself (as alternative to PR/commit comments) [networkupstools#1400]

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…p experiments with updates of GH Check reports, and noise with PR/commit comments - leave just a new GH Check entry with text of the URL (and link to details page with clickable URL) [networkupstools#1400]

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
…ell/cURL [networkupstools#1400]

Signed-off-by: Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut@gmail.com>
@jimklimov jimklimov added this to the 2.8.5 milestone Nov 11, 2025
@jimklimov jimklimov added packaging documentation CI Entries related to continuous integration infrastructure (here CI = tools + scripts + recipes) labels Nov 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Dist and Docs NUT-tarballs-PR-3177.zip are available for commit 880c206

@jimklimov jimklimov merged commit 17d206d into networkupstools:master Nov 11, 2025
58 of 62 checks passed
@jimklimov jimklimov deleted the FTY-obs branch November 11, 2025 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI Entries related to continuous integration infrastructure (here CI = tools + scripts + recipes) documentation packaging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant