Skip to content

Conversation

bahusoid
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1962

@fredericDelaporte
Copy link
Member

fredericDelaporte commented Aug 10, 2021

Is #1962 a 5.3 regression in some way? Or why target 5.3.x rather than master?
(Edit: it seems reported before 5.3 release so no, not a 5.3 regression.)

@bahusoid
Copy link
Member Author

bahusoid commented Aug 10, 2021

Is #1962 a 5.3 regression in some way?

No. It's just a one liner. So thought can be added to 5.3 too..

@fredericDelaporte fredericDelaporte added this to the 5.3.10 milestone Aug 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants