Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Collaborator
Author
|
FYI @zhindes @maxxboehme My plan is to merge this and then test it by creating a 1.2.0.dev0 release. :) |
bkeryan
commented
May 23, 2025
Collaborator
Author
Maybe I can test publishing to TestPyPI from a personal fork of the repo... I guess I would have to configure my personal fork as a trusted publisher in TestPyPI. |
Collaborator
Author
I tested the actions with TestPyPI using a personal fork of nitypes-python. |
bkeryan
force-pushed
the
users/bkeryan/publish-workflow
branch
from
579947e to
384f1a8
Compare
zhindes
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.I've added tests applicable for this pull requestWhat does this Pull Request accomplish?
Add a GitHub Actions workflow to publish the
nidaqmxpackage to PyPI using GitHub as a PyPI "Trusted Publisher".Why should this Pull Request be merged?
Enable publishing the package more easily.
What testing has been done?
Tested in a personal fork of the https://github.com/ni/nitypes-python repo.