Skip to content

Conversation

@mjohanse-emr
Copy link
Contributor

@mjohanse-emr mjohanse-emr commented Jun 30, 2025

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

In a previous submission to nitypes-python, I added a Timing.get_start_time property so that we could reference it in nipanel-python instead of using get_timestamp.

This change makes the nipanel-python part of this change.

has_start_time and has_timestamp are equivalent, so there is no functional change in this PR.

In order to get access to has_start_time I had to update to the latest version of nitypes.

Why should this Pull Request be merged?

Finishes out AB#3166841

What testing has been done?

Unit tests, mypy, styleguide.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Test Results

   10 files  ±0     10 suites  ±0   27s ⏱️ +2s
  190 tests ±0    190 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 850 runs  ±0  1 850 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 7705519. ± Comparison against base commit fbd815c.

@mjohanse-emr mjohanse-emr merged commit ea9ac44 into main Jun 30, 2025
14 checks passed
@mjohanse-emr mjohanse-emr deleted the users/mjohanse/use_has_start_time branch June 30, 2025 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants