Skip to content

Conversation

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.37%. Comparing base (2d166c6) to head (1f432a7).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #918      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.39%   69.37%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines        8478     8474       -4     
  Branches     1057     1057              
==========================================
- Hits         5883     5879       -4     
  Misses       2373     2373              
  Partials      222      222              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

FURB113 Use `.extend(...)` instead of repeatedly calling `.append()`
FURB188 Prefer `removeprefix` over conditionally replacing with slice.
@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos force-pushed the FURB branch 2 times, most recently from bc25dfc to a35db72 Compare March 2, 2025 13:36
FURB118 Use `operator.add` instead of defining a function
@effigies effigies merged commit 3927e5b into nipreps:master Mar 2, 2025
19 checks passed
@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos deleted the FURB branch March 2, 2025 17:42
effigies added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
1.13.0 (March 20, 2025)

New feature release in the 1.13.x series.

This release restructures the ANTs brain extraction workflow.
This should be a backwards compatible change, but a minor release is used out of caution.

* FIX: Remove duplicated code, problematic deviation from antsBrainExtraction (#931)
* FIX: Listify numbers (#925)
* ENH: Allow + symbol in label entities (#926, #927)
* STY: Apply various ruff checks (#913, #915, #917, #918, #919, #930)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants