Skip to content

Conversation

SeokhunEom
Copy link
Contributor

Corrects the misspelling of "proecss" to "process".

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Oct 6, 2025
@addaleax addaleax added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Oct 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Oct 6, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.52%. Comparing base (d9b8a35) to head (e1307e9).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #60132      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.54%   88.52%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         703      703              
  Lines      207809   207809              
  Branches    40009    40002       -7     
==========================================
- Hits       184006   183963      -43     
- Misses      15819    15859      +40     
- Partials     7984     7987       +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/blob.js 99.80% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 41 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Corrects the misspelling of "proecss" to "process".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants