Skip to content

Comments

Schema Expansion Fixes, Improving Copy pipeline.#449

Closed
angelosantos4 wants to merge 15 commits into0.15from
0.15.0a1
Closed

Schema Expansion Fixes, Improving Copy pipeline.#449
angelosantos4 wants to merge 15 commits into0.15from
0.15.0a1

Conversation

@angelosantos4
Copy link
Contributor

@angelosantos4 angelosantos4 commented Feb 7, 2026

Changes:

  • Adding json logging to the migrations run and copy pipeline to visualize progress and identify points of failure or lengthy operation.
  • Adding context leveling for the expansion of additional labels, preventing context bleeding. (Too many supernodes) Making the additional labels context aware is more intuitive.
  • Improving the copy pipeline to create relationship queries from adjacencies, minimizing the active memory load of operations on the database for super relationships.
  • Modifying the default creation rule of relationships from the copy pipeline from CREATE to EAGER to prevent duplicate relationships from being copied when being run multiple times.
  • Adding a script that actually revs all nodestream plugins when they are in a single higher level directory. (TODO: add to the script the short term acquisition of all plugins from github into the parent directory.)

…line creating instead of merging, improving the efficiency of the copy pipeline through the use of schema adacencies.
@angelosantos4 angelosantos4 changed the base branch from main to 0.15 February 7, 2026 01:04
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.32%. Comparing base (dce09fb) to head (552b413).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             0.15     #449      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.32%   98.32%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         152      152              
  Lines        6280     6327      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         6175     6221      +46     
- Misses        105      106       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10-macos-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
3.10-ubuntu-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.10-windows-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.11-macos-latest 98.30% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.11-ubuntu-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.11-windows-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.12-macos-latest 98.30% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.12-ubuntu-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.12-windows-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.13-macos-latest 98.30% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.13-ubuntu-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
3.13-windows-latest 98.29% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant