Open
Conversation
Contributor
Reviewer's GuideThis PR refreshes the README to be less informal and more structured, improving wording, link targets, section organization, and tables while preserving the underlying feature descriptions and usage information. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Review Summary by QodoModernize README with cleaner tone and better structure
WalkthroughsDescription• Simplified and modernized README with cleaner tone • Made badge links functional by wrapping in markdown links • Reorganized features into digestible categories • Reduced emoji usage for professional appearance • Condensed verbose sections into concise bullet points Diagramflowchart LR
A["Old README<br/>Emoji-heavy<br/>Verbose"] -- "Simplify tone<br/>Remove clutter" --> B["New README<br/>Clean & cozy<br/>Concise"]
C["Static badges"] -- "Add links" --> D["Clickable badges"]
E["Long features list"] -- "Reorganize" --> F["Categorized features"]
File Changes1. README.md
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- The bot profile links in the Bots section were changed from usernames with
[bot]to plain names (e.g.mentatbotinstead ofmentatbot[bot]), which likely breaks the URLs; consider reverting to the correct bot usernames or verifying the new links resolve properly. - In the logging description you mention “search, and export options,” but search isn’t mentioned elsewhere as a feature of the log viewer; it’s worth double-checking this to keep the README aligned with the actual UI capabilities.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The bot profile links in the Bots section were changed from usernames with `[bot]` to plain names (e.g. `mentatbot` instead of `mentatbot[bot]`), which likely breaks the URLs; consider reverting to the correct bot usernames or verifying the new links resolve properly.
- In the logging description you mention “search, and export options,” but search isn’t mentioned elsewhere as a feature of the log viewer; it’s worth double-checking this to keep the README aligned with the actual UI capabilities.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Contributor
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Code Review by Qodo
1. Broken LICENSE link
|
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| [](https://github.com/LousyBook94/DeepSeek-Desktop/actions) | ||
| [](https://github.com/LousyBook94/DeepSeek-Desktop/releases) | ||
| [](https://github.com/LousyBook94/DeepSeek-Desktop) | ||
| [](LICENSE) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. Broken license link 🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness
README now links the License badge to a local LICENSE file, but the repo does not contain a LICENSE* file, so the link will 404 and confuse users about licensing.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
README links the license badge to a local `LICENSE` file, but the repository does not include a `LICENSE` (or similarly named) file. This creates a broken link and makes licensing unclear.
### Issue Context
The README badge is now clickable and points to `LICENSE`.
### Fix Focus Areas
- README.md[3-6]
### Suggested fix
- Add a `LICENSE` file at repo root with the correct license text **or**
- Update the badge link to point to the correct existing license document/path (if it exists) or to the GitHub license page for the repo.
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is this good?
Summary by Sourcery
Revise the README to provide a clearer, calmer project description and structure while keeping the feature set the same.
Documentation: