manifest: sdk-zephyr: Pull PRF-256 PSA implementation for hostap

[VivekUppunda]

This pulls in PRF-256 PSA implementation for hostap from upstream.

[NordicBuilder]

The following west manifest projects have been modified in this Pull Request:

Name	Old Revision	New Revision	Diff
zephyr	nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr@d3d3f66 (main)	nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#2085	nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#2085/files

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the Manifest GitHub Action.

[NordicBuilder]

CI Information

^{To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above}
Build number: 7

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: 4fafd3400040298c6d4ae4362a3a11dc73f6acab
hostap: PR head: 9896a2ea803ec62e0998c0e569f12af88537d647
zephyr: PR head: 3847cd6d440dcf14272de0bb9740935d5bbd28b0

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 4fafd3400040298c6d4ae4362a3a11dc73f6acab
merge base: 39240493ae003795dfb44b18c7302f3315e1faa6
target head (main): 7064aee2128799895ed5357f886a70ece2ec9f28
Diff

hostap:

PR head: 9896a2ea803ec62e0998c0e569f12af88537d647
merge base: cbae0170437dbe196d436b2b53d7aefb97044b0c
Diff

zephyr:

PR head: 3847cd6d440dcf14272de0bb9740935d5bbd28b0
merge base: d3d3f66845737630687c9018cdb687319b74ec17
target head (main): 187d590eb8c82e4459700186b7437965191af4af
Diff

Github labels

Enabled	Name	Description
	ci-disabled	Disable the ci execution
	ci-all-test	Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
	ci-force-downstream	Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
	ci-run-twister	Force run twister
	ci-run-zephyr-twister	Force run zephyr twister

List of changed files detected by CI (51)

modules
│  ├── lib
│  │  ├── hostap
│  │  │  ├── hostapd
│  │  │  │  │ sae_pk_gen.c
│  │  │  ├── hs20
│  │  │  │  ├── client
│  │  │  │  │  ├── est.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ osu_client.c
│  │  │  │  ├── server
│  │  │  │  │  │ spp_server.c
│  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  ├── common
│  │  │  │  │  ├── dpp.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── dpp_crypto.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ sae_pk.c
│  │  │  │  ├── crypto
│  │  │  │  │  ├── crypto_mbedtls_alt.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ tls_mbedtls_alt.c
│  │  │  │  ├── drivers
│  │  │  │  │  ├── driver_zephyr.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ driver_zephyr.h
│  │  │  │  ├── eap_peer
│  │  │  │  │  │ tncc.c
│  │  │  │  ├── eap_server
│  │  │  │  │  │ tncs.c
│  │  │  │  ├── tls
│  │  │  │  │  │ tlsv1_cred.c
│  │  │  │  ├── utils
│  │  │  │  │  ├── base64.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── base64.h
│  │  │  │  │  ├── json.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── utils_module_tests.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ xml_libxml2.c
│  │  │  │  ├── wps
│  │  │  │  │  ├── upnp_xml.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── wps_er.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── wps_registrar.c
│  │  │  │  │  ├── wps_upnp.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ wps_upnp_web.c
│  │  │  ├── tests
│  │  │  │  ├── hwsim
│  │  │  │  │  ├── test_ap_wps.py
│  │  │  │  │  │ test_tnc.py
│  │  │  │  │ test-base64.c
│  │  │  ├── wpa_supplicant
│  │  │  │  ├── config_file.c
│  │  │  │  ├── dpp_supplicant.c
│  │  │  │  ├── eapol_test.c
│  │  │  │  │ hs20_supplicant.c
west.yml
zephyr
│  ├── drivers
│  │  ├── misc
│  │  │  ├── coresight
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig
│  ├── dts
│  │  ├── riscv
│  │  │  ├── nordic
│  │  │  │  │ nrf54h20_cpuflpr.dtsi
│  ├── samples
│  │  ├── boards
│  │  │  ├── nordic
│  │  │  │  ├── coresight_stm
│  │  │  │  │  ├── Kconfig.sysbuild
│  │  │  │  │  ├── boards
│  │  │  │  │  │  │ nrf54h20dk_nrf54h20_cpuapp.overlay
│  │  │  │  │  ├── remote
│  │  │  │  │  │  │ prj.conf
│  │  │  │  │  ├── sample.yaml
│  │  │  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  │  │  │ main.c
│  │  │  │  │  │ sysbuild.cmake
│  ├── snippets
│  │  ├── nordic-log-stm-dict
│  │  │  ├── boards
│  │  │  │  │ nrf54h20_cpuapp.conf
│  │  │  │ snippet.yml
│  │  ├── nordic-log-stm
│  │  │  ├── boards
│  │  │  │  │ nrf54h20_cpuapp.conf
│  │  │  │ snippet.yml
│  ├── soc
│  │  ├── nordic
│  │  │  ├── nrf54h
│  │  │  │  ├── Kconfig.defconfig.nrf54h20_cpuflpr
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig.defconfig.nrf54h20_cpuppr
│  │  │  ├── nrf54l
│  │  │  │  ├── Kconfig.defconfig.nrf54l15_cpuflpr
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig.defconfig.nrf54l15_enga_cpuflpr
│  │  │  ├── nrf92
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig.defconfig.nrf9280_cpuppr
│  ├── subsys
│  │  ├── logging
│  │  │  ├── frontends
│  │  │  │  │ Kconfig
│  │ west.yml

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: 3dd8985b56
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:3dd8985b56_81ed5a52d6

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

• ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
• ✅ Build twister - Skipped: Skipping Build & Test as it succeeded in a previous run: 5
• ✅ Integration tests
  • ✅ test-sdk-audio
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
  • ✅ test-sdk-find-my
  • ✅ test-sdk-sidewalk
  • ✅ test-sdk-wifi - Skipped: Job was skipped as it succeeded in a previous run
  • ✅ test-low-level
  • ✅ test-sdk-dfu

Disabled integration tests

• • desktop52_verification
  • doc-internal
  • test_ble_nrf_config
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_nrf_provisioning
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-proprietary_esb
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
  • test-sdk-mcuboot
  • test-sdk-pmic-samples
  • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

[NordicBuilder]

You can find the documentation preview for this PR at this link. It will be updated about 10 minutes after the documentation build succeeds.

Note: This comment is automatically posted by the Documentation Publishing GitHub Action.

[nordicjm]

@VivekUppunda can #17759 be closed?

[VivekUppunda]

@VivekUppunda can #17759 be closed?

Yes - closed the PR