-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
manifest: sdk-zephyr: [nrf fromlist] update hal_nordic revision to integrate nrfx 3.12.0 #22603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
manifest: sdk-zephyr: [nrf fromlist] update hal_nordic revision to integrate nrfx 3.12.0 #22603
Conversation
The following west manifest projects have changed revision in this Pull Request:
✅ All manifest checks OK Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the Manifest GitHub Action. |
CI InformationTo view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above Inputs:Sources:hal_nordic: PR head: 1f169d927e367eb1e161972e9504da5aa1f10c42 more detailshal_nordic:
sdk-nrf:
zephyr:
Github labels
List of changed files detected by CI (167)
Outputs:ToolchainVersion: Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped;
|
You can find the documentation preview for this PR here. |
12acf22
to
28cc9e6
Compare
9042c44
to
4b6e5f9
Compare
4b6e5f9
to
56b9d17
Compare
d25bc1b
to
495f2d7
Compare
495f2d7
to
4553fef
Compare
Memory footprint analysis revealed the following potential issuesapplications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9090[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus) Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI (latest/sdk-nrf/PR-22603/15) |
4553fef
to
d0e6537
Compare
d0e6537
to
3a1e244
Compare
Automatically created by Github Action Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
This SoC supports gain equal to `1` only. Signed-off-by: Nikodem Kastelik <[email protected]>
3a1e244
to
5998088
Compare
5998088
to
a94f4c2
Compare
Some devices has `7` DFE GPIOs rather than `8`. Signed-off-by: Nikodem Kastelik <[email protected]>
a94f4c2
to
ce1f8cc
Compare
This PR causes test failures in nrf-802154. Wasn't |
It has label CI-all-test at the beginning which was removed at the end for some reason. But yes NRFX update should be tested with CI-all-test label always. |
I have added |
Indeed, there was failure related to missing rebase, however it was related to building, thus testing on targets was not performed at all. That is why we did not catch those regression. |
https://jenkins-ncs.nordicsemi.no/blue/organizations/jenkins/latest%2Fsub%2Ftest-fw-nrfconnect-rs/detail/main/12397/tests -> ncs.nordicsemi.no/job/latest/job/sdk-nrf/job/PR-22603/9/ |
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#2930