boards: nordic: add support for TF-m to nrf7120 #24475

travis3630 · 2025-09-10T16:10:01Z

Add nrf7120 to tf-m Kconfig to support ns build
Add tfm-boards for nrf7120_cpuapp to point to trusted-firmware-m build Update soc/nordic/nrf71 for tf-m build

NordicBuilder · 2025-09-10T16:17:04Z

CI Information

^{To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above}
Build number: 15

Inputs:

Sources:

trusted-firmware-m: PR head: 902f58b94409fa12a57e6b821592ea53d8dfef96
sdk-nrf: PR head: 7950319eb5f4b487438ac155b73447cdb8e80a86

more details

trusted-firmware-m:

PR head: 902f58b94409fa12a57e6b821592ea53d8dfef96
merge base: b4dfb8e90f7a133a68fd6949bc24586af99a3e0c
Diff

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 7950319eb5f4b487438ac155b73447cdb8e80a86
merge base: 88e0590c10a577f407c945f0e3eecf313d74ab75
target head (main): f18d525114d08fbd21b8a29d7a23e6b3d843d8f3
Diff

Github labels

Enabled	Name	Description
	ci-disabled	Disable the ci execution
	ci-all-test	Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
	ci-force-downstream	Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
	ci-run-twister	Force run twister
	ci-run-zephyr-twister	Force run zephyr twister

List of changed files detected by CI (49)

boards
│  ├── nordic
│  │  ├── nrf54lv10dk
│  │  │  │ nrf54lv10dk_nrf54lv10a_cpuapp_ns_defconfig
│  │  ├── nrf7120pdk
│  │  │  │ nrf7120pdk_nrf7120_cpuapp_ns.dts
dts
│  ├── common
│  │  ├── nordic
│  │  │  ├── nrf7120_enga.dtsi
│  │  │  │ nrf7120_enga_secure_peripherals.dtsi
modules
│  ├── tee
│  │  ├── tf-m
│  │  │  ├── trusted-firmware-m
│  │  │  │  ├── platform
│  │  │  │  │  ├── ext
│  │  │  │  │  │  ├── target
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nordic_nrf
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── common
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── core
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── cmsis_drivers
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ Driver_Flash.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nrfx_config.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── services
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_platform_hal_ioctl.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── startup_nrf7120.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── target_cfg.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ target_cfg_71.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nrf7120
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── config.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── cpuarch.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── mmio_defs.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nrf71_init.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nrfx_config_nrf71.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── ns
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── partition
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── flash_layout.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ region_defs.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── tests
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ psa_arch_tests_config.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── tfm_interrupts.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── tfm_peripherals_config_nrf71.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_peripherals_def.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── nrf7120pdk_nrf7120_cpuapp
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── RTE_Device.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── config.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── cpuarch.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── device_cfg.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── ns
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ cpuarch_ns.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── services
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── include
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_platform_user_memory_ranges.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_platform_system.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── tests
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── psa_arch_tests_config.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_tests_config.cmake
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── tfm_hal_platform.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ tfm_peripherals_config.h
│  ├── trusted-firmware-m
│  │  ├── Kconfig
│  │  ├── Kconfig.tfm.defconfig
│  │  ├── Kconfig.tfm.pm
│  │  ├── tfm_boards
│  │  │  ├── CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  ├── board
│  │  │  │  ├── RTE_Device.h
│  │  │  │  │ device_cfg.h
│  │  │  ├── nrf7120_cpuapp
│  │  │  │  ├── CMakeLists.txt
│  │  │  │  ├── config.cmake
│  │  │  │  ├── cpuarch.cmake
│  │  │  │  ├── ns
│  │  │  │  │  │ cpuarch_ns.cmake
soc
│  ├── nordic
│  │  ├── nrf71
│  │  │  │ Kconfig
subsys
│  ├── partition_manager
│  │  │ pm.yml.tfm
west.yml

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: f66cf421f3
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:f66cf421f3_bba2ea5f2e

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
❌ Build twister
❌ Integration tests
- ❌ test-sdk-audio
- ❌ desktop52_verification
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
- ❌ test_ble_nrf_config
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-proprietary_esb
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-thread-main
- ❌ test-sdk-find-my
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_lrcs_mosh
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_lrcs_positioning
- ❌ test-sdk-wifi
- ❌ test-low-level
- ❌ test-sdk-pmic-samples
- ❌ test-sdk-mcuboot
- ❌ test-sdk-dfu
- ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-ps-main
- ❌ test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

github-actions · 2025-09-10T16:42:07Z

You can find the documentation preview for this PR here.

NordicBuilder · 2025-09-11T11:14:18Z

Memory footprint analysis revealed the following potential issues

sample.matter.template.release[nrf5340dk/nrf5340/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 2340[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
applications.nrf_desktop.zrelease[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 24474[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.nrf_desktop.zrelease[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 15280[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 9102[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 5858[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
sample.matter.template.debug[nrf52840dk/nrf52840]: ROM size increased by 2152[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
sample.matter.template.release[nrf7002dk/nrf5340/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 4836[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
applications.nrf_desktop.zrelease_dongle[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 768[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.nrf_desktop.zrelease_dongle[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 2664[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
sample.matter.template.release[nrf52840dk/nrf52840]: ROM size increased by 2588[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
applications.nrf_desktop.zdebug.uart[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 24478[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.nrf_desktop.zdebug.uart[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 19012[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High RAM usage: 12744[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
applications.hpf.gpio.icbmsg[nrf54l15dk/nrf54l15/cpuflpr]: High ROM usage: 9492[B] - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-ll-ursus)
sample.matter.template.debug[nrf7002dk/nrf5340/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 5072[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @kkasperczyk-no @ArekBalysNordic @markaj-nordic)
applications.nrf_desktop.zdebug_dongle.uart[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: RAM size increased by 768[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)
applications.nrf_desktop.zdebug_dongle.uart[[email protected]/nrf54h20/cpuapp]: ROM size increased by 5040[B] in comparison to the main[c434614] branch. - link (cc: @nrfconnect/ncs-si-bluebagel)

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI (latest/sdk-nrf/PR-24475/12)

tejlmand

please check line lengths.

I've pointed out some, but not all.

modules/trusted-firmware-m/Kconfig.tfm.defconfig

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/CMakeLists.txt

tejlmand · 2025-09-26T08:04:57Z

soc/nordic/nrf71/CMakeLists.txt

 endif()
+
+# WZN-6148: port this to zephyr/modules/hal_nordic/nrfx/CMakeLists.txt in future
+zephyr_compile_definitions_ifdef(CONFIG_SOC_NRF7120_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIGURATION)


we should not pollute compiler invocation line for all Zephyr sources with such configs.

Those should be provided to MDK either for only the sources which needs it or through a form of a single config header, like this: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/modules/hal_nordic/nrfx/nrfx_kconfig.h

Also providing a Kconfig -> MDK defines this way is not scalable.
The Kconfig already have dependencies, but adding the translation in CMake adds extra level of dependencies (namely the inclusion tree of the CMake file itself), which thus results in constructs like this having to be duplicated.
A single config header, as linked, allows to:

Have all Kconfig -> MDK defines at a single locations

Avoids duplicated CMake constructs when different CMake code is included in different trees.

This is what I see nrf54lx is doing it the same: https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr/blob/main/modules/hal_nordic/nrfx/CMakeLists.txt#L193 , and I think it is better to align for same workflow?

@tejlmand What should I do with this?

I think it is better to align for same workflow?

it's better to clean up the mess instead of building on top of it.

As your example show, then we now have 2 specific Kconfigs mapping to same MDK symbol, and two CMake codelines doing the same thing but in different places.

Not to mention that the trees including nrf71/CMakeLists.txt and nrfx/CMakeLists.txt may be included based on additional different (Kconfig) conditions.

The most correct thing is having a single Kconfig, which then has proper dependencies like this:

config NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG bool prompt "Skip clock frequency configuration" if TRUSTED_EXECUTION_SECURE depends on SOC_SERIES_NRF54LX || SOC_SERIES_NRF71X default y if TRUSTED_EXECUTION_NONSECURE

and then in a Kconfig to MDK mapping header have (such as this https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/modules/hal_nordic/nrfx/nrfx_kconfig.h):

#ifdef CONFIG_NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG #define NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIGURATION #endif

That will give you:

A single Kconfig setting instead of 2

Proper dependencies on the Kconfig which:

becomes part of the documentation

Can be easily seen in menuconfig

Kconfig check support, such as dependency loop checking

No line duplication in CMake, instead of two lines like:
zephyr_compile_definitions_ifdef(CONFIG_SOC_NRF7120_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIGURATION) zephyr_compile_definitions_ifdef(CONFIG_SOC_NRF54LX_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIGURATION)
there's a single location where all mapping between Kconfig and MDK can be found.

When looking at compile invocation and see gcc ..... -DNRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIGURATION ... then it's hard to know where this flag originates from and why, because this flag might be present multiple places in the CMake code, and which one was the line causing it to be set ?
But if the flag exist in a Kconfig to MDK mapping header as presented above, then it's much easier to see it's directly related to a Kconfig symbol, and I can check that Kconfig symbol for dependencies / selects.
No extra dependencies are added directly or indirectly, whereas the symbol mapping in CMake automatically adds indirect dependencies

see also: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#95874 (comment)

Have a look with this PR: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/97474/files

NordicBuilder · 2025-09-29T11:21:55Z

The following west manifest projects have changed revision in this Pull Request:

Name	Old Revision	New Revision	Diff
trusted-firmware-m	nrfconnect/sdk-trusted-firmware-m@`b4dfb8e`	nrfconnect/sdk-trusted-firmware-m@`902f58b` (`main`)	nrfconnect/[email protected]

✅ All manifest checks OK

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the Manifest GitHub Action.

travis3630 · 2025-10-06T10:20:01Z

@nrfconnect/ncs-co-boards @nrfconnect/ncs-code-owners @nrfconnect/ncs-merge @ncs-co-drivers @ncs-aegir
@tejlmand Anyone review my PR?

west.yml

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/nrf7120_cpuapp/cpuarch.cmake

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/nrf7120_cpuapp/CMakeLists.txt

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/board/RTE_Device.h

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/nrf7120_cpuapp/CMakeLists.txt

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/board/RTE_Device.h

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig

tomi-font · 2025-10-08T12:34:25Z

I have triggered a more thorough TF-M CI run: https://jenkins-ncs.nordicsemi.no/job/latest/job/sub/job/test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm/job/master/15696/

tomi-font · 2025-10-08T13:29:28Z

looks good so I merged nrfconnect/sdk-trusted-firmware-m#210

bjarki-andreasen

Approved with the expectation that # WZN-6148: port this to zephyr/modules/hal_nordic/nrfx/CMakeLists.txt in future is addressed in a future PR

Add nrf7120 to tf-m Kconfig to support ns build Add tfm-boards for nrf7120_cpuapp to point to trusted-firmware-m build Update soc/nordic/nrf71 for tf-m build Signed-off-by: Travis Lam <[email protected]>

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig

Point sdk-trusted-firmware-m in west.yaml new tfm support for nrf7120. Signed-off-by: Travis Lam <[email protected]>

travis3630 · 2025-10-13T13:32:57Z

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig

 	select HAS_SEGGER_RTT if ZEPHYR_SEGGER_MODULE
 	select SOC_EARLY_INIT_HOOK
 	select SOC_RESET_HOOK
+	select NRF_PLATFORM_LUMOS


@tejlmand I have created this new Kconfig in zephyr, so that all Kconfigs between nrf71x and nrf54lx can share the common properties, also i.e. many Kconfig that has depend on (SOC_SERIES_NRF54LX || SOC_SERIES_NRF71X) can change to depend on NRF_PLATFORM_LUMOS

travis3630 requested review from Vge0rge and degjorva September 10, 2025 16:10

travis3630 requested review from a team, Hi-Im-David, nordicjm, rob-robinson-14 and tejlmand as code owners September 10, 2025 16:10

NordicBuilder added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Sep 10, 2025

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch 2 times, most recently from 5a3c9d9 to c224bbc Compare September 11, 2025 10:10

tejlmand requested changes Sep 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

modules/trusted-firmware-m/Kconfig.tfm.defconfig Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from c224bbc to 297178e Compare September 17, 2025 16:42

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from 297178e to ed054e1 Compare September 25, 2025 15:28

tejlmand requested changes Sep 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from ed054e1 to 72cbbac Compare September 29, 2025 11:15

travis3630 requested review from a team as code owners September 29, 2025 11:21

NordicBuilder added the manifest label Sep 29, 2025

NordicBuilder added manifest-trusted-firmware-m DNM labels Sep 29, 2025

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch 2 times, most recently from ed8a898 to 68c2387 Compare September 29, 2025 11:53

travis3630 requested a review from tejlmand October 2, 2025 10:03

tomi-font requested changes Oct 6, 2025

View reviewed changes

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from 68c2387 to 984c971 Compare October 6, 2025 13:22

tomi-font requested changes Oct 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/nrf7120_cpuapp/CMakeLists.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

modules/trusted-firmware-m/tfm_boards/board/RTE_Device.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from 984c971 to c599a9b Compare October 8, 2025 09:45

tomi-font approved these changes Oct 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

bjarki-andreasen approved these changes Oct 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

boards: nordic: add support for TF-m to nrf7120

7e0bca2

Add nrf7120 to tf-m Kconfig to support ns build Add tfm-boards for nrf7120_cpuapp to point to trusted-firmware-m build Update soc/nordic/nrf71 for tf-m build Signed-off-by: Travis Lam <[email protected]>

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from c599a9b to acdea85 Compare October 13, 2025 10:58

travis3630 requested a review from kl-cruz as a code owner October 13, 2025 10:58

NordicBuilder requested review from a team October 13, 2025 10:58

travis3630 commented Oct 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

soc/nordic/nrf71/Kconfig Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

try to fix NRF_SKIP_CLOCK_CONFIG to be rebase

30e0da4

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from acdea85 to 56e1dfe Compare October 13, 2025 11:13

NordicBuilder removed the DNM label Oct 13, 2025

manifest: point sdk-tfm to nrf7120 tfm support

7950319

Point sdk-trusted-firmware-m in west.yaml new tfm support for nrf7120. Signed-off-by: Travis Lam <[email protected]>

travis3630 force-pushed the NRFX-7040-nrf7120-add-tfm-ns-build branch from 56e1dfe to 7950319 Compare October 13, 2025 11:58

travis3630 mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2025

soc: nordic: instantiate NRF_PLATFORM_LUMOS kconfig zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#97474

Open

travis3630 commented Oct 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

boards: nordic: add support for TF-m to nrf7120 #24475

Are you sure you want to change the base?

boards: nordic: add support for TF-m to nrf7120 #24475

Uh oh!

Conversation

travis3630 commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

NordicBuilder commented Sep 10, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

CI Information

Inputs:

Sources:

Github labels

Outputs:

Toolchain

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

NordicBuilder commented Sep 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Memory footprint analysis revealed the following potential issues

Uh oh!

tejlmand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

tejlmand Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

travis3630 Sep 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

travis3630 Oct 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tejlmand Oct 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

travis3630 Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

NordicBuilder commented Sep 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

travis3630 commented Oct 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

tomi-font commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

tomi-font commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

bjarki-andreasen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

travis3630 Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

NordicBuilder commented Sep 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

NordicBuilder commented Sep 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

travis3630 Sep 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

NordicBuilder commented Sep 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading