Skip to content

Conversation

@mstasiaknordic
Copy link
Contributor

P1.7 used for led 0 was not passing gpio_api_1pin test (probably shortened with another pin in the test setup. Use different pin that passes the gpio_api_1pin test. At current stage this PDK is 'virtual' so this pin is not attached to any LED and it can be changed.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chruściński [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit b298faa)

P1.7 used for led 0 was not passing gpio_api_1pin test (probably
shortened with another pin in the test setup. Use different pin
that passes the gpio_api_1pin test. At current stage this PDK is
'virtual' so this pin is not attached to any LED and it can be
changed.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chruściński <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b298faa)
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nordic-segl
Copy link
Contributor

FYI - P1.07 seems to be UART CTS signal. This could impact "led" behaviour.

@mstasiaknordic
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI - P1.07 seems to be UART CTS signal. This could impact "led" behaviour.

Yes, thats why it got changed to unused P1.10

@nordicjm nordicjm merged commit fcdc9f4 into nrfconnect:main Mar 24, 2025
20 checks passed
@mstasiaknordic mstasiaknordic deleted the nrf54l09_led0 branch May 20, 2025 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants