Skip to content

Conversation

@SebastianBoe
Copy link
Contributor

@SebastianBoe SebastianBoe commented May 1, 2025

see commit messages for details

hakonfam and others added 3 commits May 1, 2025 13:17
…rd variant

The required jlink script was not added due to missing entry in the
board check. Also change the check for app vs rad to be on SOC level.

Signed-off-by: Håkon Amundsen <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 4edc003)
This is needed for next generation Secure Domain firmware.

Upstream PR #: 88908

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
Protection circuit must be disabled to use NFCT antenna pins
as GPIOs. It can be done by adding nfct-pins-as-gpios to nfct
node in the devicetree in cpuapp. Node must be disabled as
NFCT is not used. In legacy platforms same property was added
to uicr node because that information was stored in UICR. In
nrf54h20 it is not part of UICR so property is part of nfct
node.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chruściński <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7249fac)
Port SYS_INIT to use soc_early_init_hook as SYS_INITs are legacy.

Upstream PR #: 88908

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
…service

Add an IPC service API for booting local domain cores.

Upstream PR #: 88908

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
…nit_hook

Boot the radiocore from the app in soc_late_init_hook.

Upstream PR #: 88908

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
…/cpuapp/iron

Add support for nrf54h20dk/nrf54h20/cpuapp/iron to the
samples/sysbuild/hello_world sample.

Upstream PR #: 88908

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 2, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathannilsen jonathannilsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#88908 there is a commit that enables the cpusec_bellboard for cpuapp, should that be added here as well?

@SebastianBoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Evidently it is not needed.

I suppose it could trickle down naturally.

I could also cherry-pick it after this PR, but I'd rather not making any unnecessary changes that could delay this PR.

@rlubos rlubos merged commit 93b3a7e into nrfconnect:main May 5, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants