Skip to content

Conversation

tejlmand
Copy link
Contributor

Remove the prompt for REMOTE_BOARD.
REMOTE_BOARD should not be having a prompt or be configurable on command
line.
Instead REMOTE_BOARD should be defined based on the SoC as this will
allow creation of new boards using the same SoC, and thereby be able
to build the sample out-of-the-box for any supported SoC.

This allows us to remove several single line config files.

For SoCs with more than two CPU clusters, such as the nRF54h20, then a
choice is provided to select specific core.

Remove the REMOTE_BOARD restriction, as this sample will build and run
even for single core SoCs, and may be useful for testing other sysbuild
multi-image features even for single cores SoCs.

Upstream PR #: 95745

tejlmand and others added 4 commits September 11, 2025 09:51
Remove the prompt for REMOTE_BOARD.
REMOTE_BOARD should not be having a prompt or be configurable on command
line.
Instead REMOTE_BOARD should be defined based on the SoC as this will
allow creation of new boards using the same SoC, and thereby be able
to build the sample out-of-the-box for any supported SoC.

This allows us to remove several single line config files.

For SoCs with more than two CPU clusters, such as the nRF54h20, then a
choice is provided to select specific core.

Remove the REMOTE_BOARD restriction, as this sample will build and run
even for single core SoCs, and may be useful for testing other sysbuild
multi-image features even for single cores SoCs.

Upstream PR #: 95745

Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <[email protected]>
Pass on the board revision to remote image build if specified for the
application image board target.

Upstream PR #: 95745

Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <[email protected]>
PM support is still required for nRF53/nRF54l15 in the context of NCS.

Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <[email protected]>
@tejlmand tejlmand force-pushed the sysbuild_hello_world_cleanup branch from 329d8cd to ba5b69f Compare September 11, 2025 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants