Tests, Clearing, Fixes

[GGsrvg]

Added C++ tests:

• One simplex test
• All tests from "py/tests"

Removed unused includes and commented code
Added compilation options for code verification

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.29%. Comparing base (b89f9d7) to head (4080df1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #207      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.18%   82.29%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1774     1785      +11     
  Branches      242      242              
==========================================
+ Hits         1458     1469      +11     
  Misses        172      172              
  Partials      144      144              

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[GGsrvg]

@MatthieuDartiailh hey, its me again
Can you review this mr?

[GGsrvg]

Next issues could be closed
#135 fixed
#132 CMake helps with it
#60 Tests is a best documentation

[MatthieuDartiailh]

Could you add a CI job to run the added C++ tests ?

[GGsrvg]

@MatthieuDartiailh yes, I will do it. Call tests on every commit to the main branch? How do you want it to work?

[MatthieuDartiailh]

Yes. You can follow the trigger used for Python jobs. However running on Linux should be enough for the C++ tests.

[GGsrvg]

@MatthieuDartiailh I did it.

PS: Could you please take a look at why it fails with the "Generating documentation" error every time? I don't know enough Python to try to fix this.

[MatthieuDartiailh]

The documentation issue comes from sphinx-tabs which is incompatible with latest sphinx version. PR are open to fix the issue but have not been merged yet.

[GGsrvg]

What else is needed to accept this mr?

[GGsrvg]

@MatthieuDartiailh can you suggest anything?

[MatthieuDartiailh]

One minor point but otherwise LGTM. Sorry for the slow review.

[MatthieuDartiailh]

The commented code is there to easily check the relevance of using AssocVec vs a standard map.
I can understand the urge to remove commented out code but in this occurrence I would feel better to keep it. You may add a comment explaining why it is there.

[MatthieuDartiailh]

Thanks !

[GGsrvg]

@MatthieuDartiailh what you think about it? #207 (comment)

Can you release a new version? This is necessary so that we can use 'FetchContent' with the tag.