Skip to content

Conversation

@nullchimp
Copy link
Owner

Potential fix for https://github.com/nullchimp/ai-agent/security/code-scanning/1

To fix the issue, we will add a permissions block at the root level of the workflow file. This block will explicitly set the permissions to contents: read, which is sufficient for the current workflow. This ensures that the workflow does not have unnecessary write permissions, improving security.


Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

nullchimp and others added 2 commits May 10, 2025 11:57
…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@nullchimp nullchimp marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2025 10:12
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 10, 2025 10:12
@nullchimp nullchimp merged commit 75e420e into main May 10, 2025
4 checks passed
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses a code-scanning alert by adding an explicit permissions block to the workflow and updates tests and CI configuration to ensure coverage and proper test environment setup.

  • Add permissions: contents: read to the workflow to limit permissions
  • Enhance test suite with new chatloop decorator tests and improve process_one testing
  • Introduce conftest.py for standardized pytest-asyncio configuration and environment variables

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/utils/test_utils_init.py Changed import path and added async decorator tests
tests/test_main.py Refactored process_one test to mock sleep and assert calls
tests/conftest.py New pytest fixtures for environment and event loop setup
.github/workflows/test-coverage.yml Added permissions block, venv setup, and expanded pytest command

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants