-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
feat: automatically enable Cilium kube-proxy replacement feature #1286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
| // Copyright 2025 Nutanix. All rights reserved. | ||
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| package utils | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| clusterv1 "sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/api/v1beta1" | ||
| controlplanev1 "sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/controlplane/kubeadm/api/v1beta1" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // ShouldSkipKubeProxy returns true if the cluster is configured to skip kube proxy installation. | ||
| func ShouldSkipKubeProxy(cluster *clusterv1.Cluster) bool { | ||
| if cluster.Spec.Topology != nil { | ||
| _, isSkipKubeProxy := cluster.Spec.Topology.ControlPlane.Metadata.Annotations[controlplanev1.SkipKubeProxyAnnotation] | ||
| return isSkipKubeProxy | ||
| } | ||
| return false | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | ||
| // Copyright 2025 Nutanix. All rights reserved. | ||
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| package addons | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "context" | ||
|
|
||
| "github.com/go-logr/logr" | ||
| clusterv1 "sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api/api/v1beta1" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| type TestStrategy struct { | ||
| err error | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func NewTestStrategy(err error) *TestStrategy { | ||
| return &TestStrategy{err: err} | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (s TestStrategy) Apply( | ||
| ctx context.Context, | ||
| cluster *clusterv1.Cluster, | ||
| defaultsNamespace string, | ||
| log logr.Logger, | ||
| ) error { | ||
| return s.err | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this safe only when
kubeProxyReplacementis true? I thought it was always safe.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added it back because unfortunately just setting
kubeProxyReplacementdoes not trigger a Pod rollout.In a follow up I will remove it if the rest of the config for IP preservation does result in new Pods.
Although
kubeProxyReplacementis not really necessary with the current config without kube-proxy replacement.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not like this - it's too opaque as to why the necessary pods are being rolled out. We should have a better defined trigger for this.