[plonk_wasm] Don't pass around unnecessary vectors #3152
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Applying MinaProtocol/mina#16775 to
proof-systemssince the code movedManually allocating can potentially side-step a compiler optimization of re-using previous allocations where possible. Also, it's not a good practive to pass in a
Vecto a function where all you do with theVecis callas_slice. AVecconsists of a pointer, a length, and a capacity whereas a slice is only a pointer and a length. Slices should always be prefered when elements aren't being added or removed.