Skip to content

Conversation

@raphael-proust
Copy link
Contributor

This pull-request concerns:

  • lwt.6.0.0: Promises and event-driven I/O
  • lwt_direct.6.0.0: Direct-style control-flow and await for Lwt
  • lwt_ppx.6.0.0: PPX syntax for Lwt, providing something similar to async/await from JavaScript
  • lwt_runtime_events.6.0.0: Emit runtime events to trace the execution of Lwt programs


🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.5.1

raphael-proust added a commit to raphael-proust/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2026
used to be `dev` which made no sense (we don't want to depend on dev
version of `ocamlfind`), now is `with-dev-setup`

see ocaml#29184 (review)
@mseri
Copy link
Member

mseri commented Jan 11, 2026

I am not sure about this failure: https://opam.ci.ocaml.org/github/ocaml/opam-repository/commit/1a538ed11284d3a47bf9851621c653c567cbc1a3/variant/compilers,4.14,lwt.6.0.0,revdeps,osc.0.1.4

Do you think it has anything to do with this PR? If not, I think we can finally merge

@raphael-proust
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't think the failure is from this PR. See #29147 (comment) for previous discussion. TL;DR:

  • older versions of lwt already mention mutex
  • i think it's changes in the build system which makes it necessary to explicitly mention some cli flag to get mutex

also note: the package is in avoid-version (#29185) (following identical failure in previous lwt release PR)

@mseri mseri merged commit 7d22a58 into ocaml:master Jan 12, 2026
3 of 5 checks passed
@mseri
Copy link
Member

mseri commented Jan 12, 2026

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants