Change rocq-prover version from 9.0.0 to meta.1#29190
Merged
mseri merged 1 commit intoocaml:masterfrom Jan 7, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Since ocaml#28179 the rocq-prover package is a pure metapackage not depending on rocq-core version, this makes the old 9.0.0 version number (no longer updated) confusing, c.f., https://rocq-prover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/237977-Rocq-users/topic/diff.20version.20Rocq.20Core.2C.20and.20Rocq.20Prover/with/561649780 A version number clearly conveying the metapackage status should help. We have 9.0.0 < meta.1 in the version ordering which should avoid too much trouble.
Contributor
Author
|
The linting error is expected since this is a metapackage (no source, only dependencies, by definition). |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since #28179 the rocq-prover package is a pure metapackage not depending on rocq-core version, this makes the old 9.0.0 version number (no longer updated) confusing, c.f., https://rocq-prover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/237977-Rocq-users/topic/diff.20version.20Rocq.20Core.2C.20and.20Rocq.20Prover/with/561649780
A version number clearly conveying the metapackage status should help.
We have 9.0.0 < meta.1 in the version ordering which should avoid too much trouble.