Skip to content

Conversation

@vinser52
Copy link
Contributor

@vinser52 vinser52 commented Dec 5, 2024

Description

Minor fixes to properly clean up resources when disjoint pool params functions return an error.

Checklist

  • Code compiles without errors locally
  • All tests pass locally
  • CI workflows execute properly

@vinser52 vinser52 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 10:31
@vinser52 vinser52 requested a review from bratpiorka December 5, 2024 12:53
Copy link
Contributor

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually, shouldn't this go to v0.10.x ...?

@bratpiorka
Copy link
Contributor

bratpiorka commented Dec 5, 2024

actually, shouldn't this go to v0.10.x ...?

this is not needed there as this only fixes tests - there is no bug in Disjoint Pool implementation ..
but we also have coverity :) - OK I will add 0.10x label

@vinser52
Copy link
Contributor Author

vinser52 commented Dec 5, 2024

I think it is not needed for 0.10. It is even was not detected by Coverity. I found this minor issue when investigated Coverity issue and looked through the code, but it was not reported by Coverity.

@vinser52
Copy link
Contributor Author

vinser52 commented Dec 5, 2024

@bratpiorka what is your final answer, should I switch target branch to 0.10 or will we merge just to the main?

@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor

ok, that's perferct, if not found by the coverity tool, then it's ok

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk merged commit 2793e6a into oneapi-src:main Dec 5, 2024
77 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants