Skip to content

📖 restructure README with enhanced project positioning and expanded component details#1109

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopen-cluster-management-io:mainfrom
mikeshng:update-readme
Aug 6, 2025
Merged

📖 restructure README with enhanced project positioning and expanded component details#1109
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopen-cluster-management-io:mainfrom
mikeshng:update-readme

Conversation

@mikeshng
Copy link
Member

@mikeshng mikeshng commented Aug 4, 2025

Summary

doc: restructure README with enhanced project positioning and expanded component details

Related issue(s)

Fixes #NA

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Completely overhauled and expanded the README to provide a detailed, structured overview of the project, including goals, architecture, core components, built-in extensions, integrations, use cases, community resources, setup instructions, and licensing information.
  • Chores
    • Updated documentation workflow triggers to include all markdown files.
    • Adjusted test workflows to ignore changes in markdown files, preventing unnecessary test runs.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and qiujian16 August 4, 2025 16:29
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The README.md file was extensively rewritten and expanded, transforming it from a brief introduction into a detailed and structured project overview. The update adds comprehensive sections on project goals, architecture, components, integrations, use cases, setup instructions, community engagement, and licensing, with no changes to code or exported entities. Additionally, GitHub Actions workflows were updated to include README.md and other markdown files in documentation-only triggers and exclude them from E2E test triggers.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Rewrote and expanded the README with detailed project overview, architecture, components, integrations, use cases, setup, community, and license sections. No code changes.
GitHub Actions Workflow Updates
.github/workflows/doc-only.yml, .github/workflows/e2e.yml
Modified workflow triggers to include README.md and all markdown files for doc-only workflow activation and exclude them from E2E workflow triggers on pull requests. No other workflow changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Suggested labels

lgtm, approved

Suggested reviewers

  • qiujian16

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02453e8 and 74da45c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/doc-only.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/doc-only.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: integration
  • GitHub Check: e2e-singleton
  • GitHub Check: unit
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: e2e-hosted
  • GitHub Check: verify
  • GitHub Check: e2e
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

1-1: Provide descriptive alt-text for images

All three Markdown images use the placeholder alt-text “image”. This hurts accessibility and search-engine indexing.

-![image](assets/ocm-logo.png)
+![OCM logo](assets/ocm-logo.png)

-![image](assets/cncf.png)
+![CNCF logo](assets/cncf.png)

-![OCM Architecture](assets/ocm-arch.png)   # already descriptive, keep

Also applies to: 12-12, 39-39


107-107: Missing hyphen in compound adjective

The phrase “open source” precedes the noun “projects” and should be hyphenated (“open-source projects”) per the LanguageTool hint.

-We constantly work with other open source projects
+We constantly work with other open-source projects
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4f1951 and 67db921.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: in the open-cluster-management-io/ocm repository, the team prefers to use commit shas instead of tag...
Learnt from: zhujian7
PR: open-cluster-management-io/ocm#1070
File: SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T09:30:25.378Z
Learning: In the open-cluster-management-io/ocm repository, the team prefers to use commit SHAs instead of tags for GitHub Actions dependencies like dependency-review-action for security reasons, as commit SHAs are immutable while tags can be moved.

Applied to files:

  • README.md
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~107-~107: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...grations We constantly work with other open source projects to make multicluster managemen...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: e2e-singleton
  • GitHub Check: e2e-hosted
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: integration
  • GitHub Check: unit
  • GitHub Check: verify
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

75-76: Documentation links verified – no broken relative paths
I’ve confirmed that the following directories referenced in README.md exist and will not 404 when rendered on GitHub:

  • solutions/cluster-api
  • solutions/deploy-argocd-apps-pull
  • solutions/setup-dev-environment

@mikeshng mikeshng force-pushed the update-readme branch 3 times, most recently from 6e98489 to 3f7fa50 Compare August 4, 2025 16:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.82%. Comparing base (a4f1951) to head (74da45c).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1109   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.82%   57.82%           
=======================================
  Files         211      211           
  Lines       20592    20592           
=======================================
  Hits        11907    11907           
  Misses       7627     7627           
  Partials     1058     1058           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 57.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

14-20: Consider adding a Table of Contents for easier navigation

The README has grown substantially (≈130 lines). A small ToC near the top would let readers jump straight to the sections that matter to them and keeps the doc scannable.
Example insertion right after the introductory paragraph:

+## Table of Contents
+* [Project Goals and Objectives](#project-goals-and-objectives)
+* [What OCM Does](#what-ocm-does)
+* [Core Architecture](#core-architecture)
+* [Core Components](#core-components)
+* [Built-in Extensions](#built-in-extensions)
+* [Cloud Native Use Cases](#cloud-native-use-cases)
+* [Getting Started](#getting-started)
+* [External Integrations](#external-integrations)
+* [Documentation and Resources](#documentation-and-resources)
+* [Community](#community)
+* [License](#license)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67db921 and 02453e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/doc-only.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/doc-only.yml
  • .github/workflows/e2e.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: in the open-cluster-management-io/ocm repository, the team prefers to use commit shas instead of tag...
Learnt from: zhujian7
PR: open-cluster-management-io/ocm#1070
File: SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T09:30:25.378Z
Learning: In the open-cluster-management-io/ocm repository, the team prefers to use commit SHAs instead of tags for GitHub Actions dependencies like dependency-review-action for security reasons, as commit SHAs are immutable while tags can be moved.

Applied to files:

  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: integration
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: unit
  • GitHub Check: verify
  • GitHub Check: e2e-singleton
  • GitHub Check: e2e-hosted
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

1-1: Verify that referenced images resolve in all distribution channels

The three local images (assets/ocm-logo.png, assets/cncf.png, assets/ocm-arch.png) assume an assets/ folder at the repo root.
Please confirm these assets exist (and are added to the PR) so the badges render correctly on GitHub, pkg.go.dev, and mirrored documentation sites.

Also applies to: 12-12, 39-39

…ed component details

Signed-off-by: Mike Ng <ming@redhat.com>
@mikeshng
Copy link
Member Author

mikeshng commented Aug 5, 2025

/assign @qiujian16

@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 6, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng, qiujian16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fa691ec into open-cluster-management-io:main Aug 6, 2025
24 checks passed
@mikeshng mikeshng deleted the update-readme branch October 29, 2025 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants