🌱 feat: add Guidewire as adopters

[jeffw17]

Summary

Adding Guidewire as adopters of OCM

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the adopters list to include Guidewire Software Inc. as a new end-user.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added Guidewire Software Inc. as a new End user adopter entry in ADOPTERS.md, including the year 2025, website link, and description of their OCM implementation for AWS IAM-based registration mechanism on EKS clusters.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Adopters List Update ADOPTERS.md	Added new End user entry for Guidewire Software Inc. with company details and OCM usage description

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

This is a straightforward documentation entry addition with no logic or structural changes—purely data extension to the adopters list.

Possibly related PRs

• 📖 update Adopters file with latest list, links, and use cases #1068 — Restructured ADOPTERS.md into a detailed table format and added multiple adopter entries; directly related as this PR continues expanding the adopters list in the same file.

Suggested labels

lgtm, approved

Suggested reviewers

• jnpacker
• qiujian16
• deads2k

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly indicates the main change: adding Guidewire as adopters in the ADOPTERS.md file, which matches the changeset summary.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description provides the Summary section ('Adding Guidewire as adopters of OCM') but the Related issue(s) section is incomplete with no issue number filled in.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d5d82c and 076b5cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• ADOPTERS.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

ADOPTERS.md

18-18: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

---

18-18: Link text should be descriptive

(MD059, descriptive-link-text)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: integration
• GitHub Check: unit
• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: verify

🔇 Additional comments (1)

ADOPTERS.md (1)

18-18: Fix table formatting: add trailing pipe and use descriptive link text.

Line 18 is missing the trailing pipe delimiter, breaking consistency with markdown table formatting standards (MD055). Additionally, the link text should be more descriptive than the generic [Link] (MD059).

Apply this diff:

-| End user | Guidewire Software Inc. | 2025 | [Link](https://www.guidewire.com/) | Guidewire Software Inc. uses OCM in their Cloud platform for their P&C Insurance customers. To utilize OCM on their platform, they have contributed to the OCM project with implementation of enabling AWS IAM-based registration mechanism on EKS clusters. 
+| End user | Guidewire Software Inc. | 2025 | [Guidewire](https://www.guidewire.com/) | Guidewire Software Inc. uses OCM in their Cloud platform for their P&C Insurance customers. To utilize OCM on their platform, they have contributed to the OCM project with implementation of enabling AWS IAM-based registration mechanism on EKS clusters. |

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.22%. Comparing base (6d5d82c) to head (076b5cd).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1293      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.28%   62.22%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         209      209              
  Lines       17045    17045              
==========================================
- Hits        10616    10607       -9     
- Misses       5311     5319       +8     
- Partials     1118     1119       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	62.22% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[qiujian16]

/approve
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amrcoder, jeffw17, qiujian16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [qiujian16]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment