Skip to content

Conversation

@Skarlso
Copy link
Contributor

@Skarlso Skarlso commented Jan 16, 2025

@Skarlso Skarlso requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 08:49
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

@Skarlso Skarlso force-pushed the fix-verified-version-deployment branch from bed93ef to 39c3b7f Compare January 16, 2025 08:55
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

@Skarlso Skarlso force-pushed the fix-verified-version-deployment branch from e2649b6 to b214c6b Compare January 16, 2025 09:55
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

Signed-off-by: Gergely Brautigam <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

Copy link
Contributor

@frewilhelm frewilhelm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Co-authored-by: Frederic Wilhelm <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

frewilhelm
frewilhelm previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2025
@Skarlso Skarlso added the area/ipcei Important Project of Common European Interest label Jan 16, 2025
@Skarlso
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skarlso commented Jan 16, 2025

I'm waiting for Dan or the other person to test this PR.

@dee0sap
Copy link
Contributor

dee0sap commented Jan 16, 2025

Hey @Skarlso

Someone here was just testing this and noticed that the verify is repeatedly happening for all versions in the repo.

Looking at your change I see this is because you put the verify in ListComponentVersions.

Given the expense of Verify probably the check should be in GetLatestValidComponentVersion in this loop

for _, v := range versions {
		if valid, _ := constraint.Validate(v.Semver); valid {
                       if /* make verify check here */ {
                           return v.Version, nil
                       }
		}
	}

This way the expensive verify check is happening as few times as possible.

Oh, and another possible optimization....

In VerifyComponent I think there could be a big performance boost if there was first just a check to see if the ComponentDescriptor has all the signatures required by the ComponentVersion. From what I see in the code what I believe is happening is that we are going through and computing digests first.

@Skarlso
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skarlso commented Jan 16, 2025

The whole thing could be rewritten but I just don't have the capacity for that right now. I'll make the adjustment though and put it into the semver constraint check. :)

@Skarlso Skarlso dismissed stale reviews from jakobmoellerdev and frewilhelm via a65b7fe January 16, 2025 21:25
…ponent-model/ocm-controller into fix-verified-version-deployment
@Skarlso Skarlso force-pushed the fix-verified-version-deployment branch from a65b7fe to e654954 Compare January 16, 2025 21:26
@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

@dee0sap
Copy link
Contributor

dee0sap commented Jan 16, 2025

Sounds good @Skarlso

For VerifyComponent, should I add an issue? Perhaps a feature enhancement?

@Skarlso
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skarlso commented Jan 17, 2025

Yes sure. Also the whole thing is doing a lookup twice instead of just getting a version.

@github-actions
Copy link

Mend Scan Summary: ❌

Repository: open-component-model/ocm-controller

VIOLATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
HIGH/CRITICAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES 4
MAJOR UPDATES AVAILABLE 0
LICENSE REQUIRES REVIEW 1
LICENSE RISK HIGH 9
RESTRICTED LICENSE FOR ON-PREMISE DELIVERY 0

Detailed Logs: mend-scan-> Generate Report
Mend UI

@Skarlso Skarlso merged commit 287a715 into main Jan 17, 2025
8 checks passed
@Skarlso Skarlso deleted the fix-verified-version-deployment branch January 17, 2025 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/ipcei Important Project of Common European Interest

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OCM-Controller skips verified components if they aren’t the latest

5 participants