Skip to content

feat(spp): DOMA-12957 new model to track spp user actions#7310

Merged
dkoviazin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/spp/Doma-12957/new_model_spp_user_event
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

feat(spp): DOMA-12957 new model to track spp user actions#7310
dkoviazin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/spp/Doma-12957/new_model_spp_user_event

Conversation

@dkoviazin
Copy link
Contributor

@dkoviazin dkoviazin commented Mar 5, 2026

Add spp user event for uploading depts registry file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal registry-importer submodule to latest version.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 5, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dccce819-0894-48bd-a9b4-0a09185b5860

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1ebc38 and 22c5d1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/registry-importer

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The apps/registry-importer submodule pointer was advanced to a newer commit. The submodule reference was updated from one commit hash to another without introducing any code changes, logic modifications, or public API alterations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Submodule Update
apps/registry-importer
Submodule commit pointer advanced; no functional code changes in the working directory.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A whisker twitch, a hop so fine,
The submodule now points in line,
A pointer skip to newer ground,
No code was changed—just refs resound! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title references 'spp user actions' but the actual change only updates a submodule pointer for registry-importer with no observable code changes. Clarify whether the title accurately reflects the changes in this specific PR, or if it describes changes made within the submodule itself.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/spp/Doma-12957/new_model_spp_user_event

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Confidence Score: 3/5

  • The submodule pointer bump is a safe change, but the commit message violates the 52-character header limit documented in project guidelines.
  • The main repository change (submodule pointer update) is inherently safe and low-risk. However, the commit message header exceeds the project's documented 52-character maximum (57 characters vs. 52 limit per AGENTS.md line 421), which violates the commit message convention. The actual implementation in the external submodule cannot be verified from this repository. Score of 3 reflects a safe change with a correctable style violation that should be addressed before merge.
  • apps/registry-importer should be reviewed in its own repository (condo-registry-importer) to verify the new SPP user action model's schema, migrations, and test coverage.

Last reviewed commit: 22c5d1d

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2026

@dkoviazin dkoviazin merged commit 61cf86c into main Mar 5, 2026
40 of 45 checks passed
@dkoviazin dkoviazin deleted the feat/spp/Doma-12957/new_model_spp_user_event branch March 5, 2026 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants