Skip to content

Conversation

@jdanieck
Copy link
Contributor

@jdanieck jdanieck commented Dec 30, 2025

📝 Description

Adds comprehensive design documentation for the new Tracker Service - a C++ microservice for real-time multi-object tracking.

Related: ADR-0007.

Related PRs

✨ Type of Change

Select the type of change your PR introduces:

  • 🐞 Bug fix – Non-breaking change which fixes an issue
  • 🚀 New feature – Non-breaking change which adds functionality
  • 🔨 Refactor – Non-breaking change which refactors the code base
  • 💥 Breaking change – Changes that break existing functionality
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🔒 Security update
  • 🧪 Tests
  • 🚂 CI

🧪 Testing Scenarios

Describe how the changes were tested and how reviewers can test them too:

  • ✅ Tested manually
  • 🤖 Ran automated end-to-end tests

✅ Checklist

Before submitting the PR, ensure the following:

  • 🔍 PR title is clear and descriptive
  • 📝 For internal contributors: If applicable, include the JIRA ticket number (e.g., ITEP-123456) in the PR title. Do not include full URLs
  • 💬 I have commented my code, especially in hard-to-understand areas
  • 📄 I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • ✅ I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or my feature works

@jdanieck jdanieck self-assigned this Dec 30, 2025
@jdanieck jdanieck force-pushed the tracker-service-design branch from 49ac207 to eb1d214 Compare January 2, 2026 09:15
@jdanieck jdanieck force-pushed the tracker-service-design branch from eb1d214 to f6bfe3a Compare January 2, 2026 09:16
@jdanieck jdanieck changed the base branch from main to rv-cmake-refactor January 2, 2026 09:17
@jdanieck jdanieck mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2026
15 tasks
Base automatically changed from rv-cmake-refactor to main January 14, 2026 11:58
@jdanieck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Schema moved to #933 for early review, unblocking implementation work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants