Benchmarks: add TIMES NZ, IE, and eTIMES-EU benchmarks

[danielelerede-oet]

Hi @siddharth-krishna , Victor's TIMES benchmarks added with metadata (with Contributor line) and update of benchmark_config.yaml

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
solver-benchmark	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Apr 3, 2025 1:33pm

[danielelerede-oet]

added TIMES-NZ benchmarks @siddharth-krishna , I'm updating the slides, too

[siddharth-krishna]

Thanks, Daniele. I requested some minor changes. I'll merge #99 first, so it would be good if you could also indicate the sizes, or at least which ones count as "real" -- I would guess all of them?

[danielelerede-oet]

Hi @siddharth-krishna , I made the changes you asked

[siddharth-krishna]

Hi Daniele, apologies I dropped the ball on this PR and now it's stale and needs to be updated with the main branch (and the info from benchmark_config.yaml needs to be merged into the metadata.yaml file, e.g. URL). Would you have time to do this?

Other remaining TODOs:

• Remove Olex's affiliation
• The 2 new comments I've added inline

[danielelerede-oet]

Hi @siddharth-krishna , I've done all the changes, though I was having issues with merging the main branch. The metadata file is completely revised though. If there are any problems I could save the file locally and open a new PR generating the new branch from the current main, let me know please :)

[siddharth-krishna]

Thanks, @danielelerede-oet . I fixed a syntax error and ran the merge_metadata.py script. I am able to run these benchmarks successfully (though with a 10s timeout, so they all timed out). I think the only remaining thing is to decide the size category for these new benchmarks. Should we mark them all as R, so they are run with a 10h timeout? Or should we run them with a 1h timeout and see if they can be solved quicker?

I didn't see any merge issues. But if you could double check that the diff in https://github.com/open-energy-transition/solver-benchmark/pull/96/files has the latest metadata, that would be great. It looks good to me, but I can't check if the benchmark metadata has been categorized correctly.

[danielelerede-oet]

@siddharth-krishna everything's fine with the diff.
They should all be solved within 1 hour, even though they can be considered as "real" benchmarks from the modelling point of view.
Also, could you please check that the "Name" format with "ts" instead of "h" works well? In case yes, I should make the modifications on some other benchmarks, too, but probably better to open a new PR once all the benchmarks are merged to the main branch

[siddharth-krishna]

Thanks, Daniele, I think with the new website you can have anything in the "Name:" field, it doesn't have to follow the old format of <spatial_res>-<temporal_res>. Please do open a new PR updating all the metadata as you suggest, and we'll double check in that branch that the website continues to work fine.