Skip to content

feat: Envoy connection lost test added (needs working targetURI)#300

Merged
aepfli merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/add_target_uri_tests_with_unavailable_code
Sep 9, 2025
Merged

feat: Envoy connection lost test added (needs working targetURI)#300
aepfli merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/add_target_uri_tests_with_unavailable_code

Conversation

@aepfli
Copy link
Member

@aepfli aepfli commented Sep 9, 2025

No description provided.

@aepfli aepfli requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2025 06:04
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @aepfli, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces new Gherkin feature tests to validate the resilience of the flagd provider. It focuses on ensuring that the provider can gracefully handle scenarios where its connection to an Envoy proxy is temporarily lost and then successfully re-established, specifically when configured with a targetUri for in-process communication.

Highlights

  • New Connection Loss Scenarios: Added two new Gherkin scenarios to gherkin/connection.feature to test the flagd provider's ability to handle connection loss and successful reconnection when using an Envoy targetUri in-process.
  • Grace Period Testing: One of the new scenarios specifically includes a grace period, ensuring that the reconnection mechanism functions correctly under such conditions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds two new Gherkin scenarios to test reconnection functionality using targetUri. My review has identified that one of the new scenarios is a duplicate of the other, despite having a name that implies different functionality ('with grace period'). This means the intended behavior is not being tested. This should be corrected to ensure the tests are meaningful and provide correct coverage.

@aepfli aepfli force-pushed the feat/add_target_uri_tests_with_unavailable_code branch from 892889d to a19755d Compare September 9, 2025 06:13
Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <simon.schrottner@dynatrace.com>
@aepfli aepfli force-pushed the feat/add_target_uri_tests_with_unavailable_code branch from a19755d to 09686d9 Compare September 9, 2025 06:14
@aepfli aepfli merged commit 7565c27 into main Sep 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@aepfli aepfli deleted the feat/add_target_uri_tests_with_unavailable_code branch December 28, 2025 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants