Skip to content

feat: improve forbidden with options#304

Merged
toddbaert merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/forbidden-options
Oct 30, 2025
Merged

feat: improve forbidden with options#304
toddbaert merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/forbidden-options

Conversation

@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

Adds options to forbidden.

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@toddbaert toddbaert requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 17:32
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @toddbaert, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the system's error handling by allowing the configuration of 'forbidden' responses. It introduces an option to specify which status codes should be considered fatal, thereby improving the flexibility and robustness of how the system reacts to such conditions. The change is reflected in an updated Gherkin test scenario that now explicitly sets a fatal status code before simulating a forbidden provider.

Highlights

  • Forbidden Options: Introduced the ability to configure options for the 'forbidden' state, specifically demonstrated by setting 'fatalStatusCodes'.
  • Test Scenario Update: Updated the 'Provider forbidden' test scenario in gherkin/connection.feature to include the configuration of fatalStatusCodes with 'PERMISSION_DENIED'.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Comment on lines +56 to +57
Given an option "fatalStatusCodes" of type "StringList" with value "PERMISSION_DENIED"
And a forbidden flagd provider
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mimicked the same setup for other tests (option first, provider state second).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, because we actually initialize on this provider step

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 00b7cfb into main Oct 30, 2025
3 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new option to configure fatal status codes for the flagd provider and updates the test suite to cover this new functionality. The change is straightforward, but I have one suggestion to improve the Gherkin step to make the test scenario more readable and maintainable by abstracting away implementation details, which aligns better with BDD best practices.

# This test ensures that a forbidden response from flagd results in a fatal client state
Scenario: Provider forbidden
Given a forbidden flagd provider
Given an option "fatalStatusCodes" of type "StringList" with value "PERMISSION_DENIED"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this step is functional, it exposes implementation details like the option name (fatalStatusCodes) and type (StringList), making the scenario less readable from a business perspective. To align better with BDD principles, consider creating a more descriptive, domain-specific step that hides these details. A more readable step could be something like Given the provider is configured to treat 'PERMISSION_DENIED' as a fatal status code. This would make the scenario's intent clearer and more resilient to changes in the underlying option implementation.

    Given the provider is configured to treat 'PERMISSION_DENIED' as a fatal status code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants